Hillary takes a beating.

homerskid · Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: Hillary takes a beating.

Three cheers for Tim Russert!!!

Someone finally held Hillary's feet to the fire and showed the world how she NEVER takes a stand on one side of ANY issue.

She double speaks on everything.
Tim called her on it,and she did not like it one bit...lol

Tim and the other candidates pointed out that she gave two opposing answers to the question about licenses for illegals within 2 minutes.

Sort of the now famous,"it depends on the meaning of the word is" crap Bubba tried to get away with...lol

And get this...Hillary's camp came out today claiming Russert's questioning was unfair..Bwahahaha..they did not say that when he pressed the Republicans for clarification during their debate.

This link will take you to two video clips.
Ya gotta watch them both...she really squirmed.

http://www.rightwingnews.com/

The Top 6 Attacks On Hillary At Last Night's Debate

PS: Last night, I suffered through another hideous Democratic debate which featured 2 hours of socialists talking about how rotten everything is in this country, followed by each of them blaming every bad thing that's happening on Bush -- and then they all promised to fix each problem with either massive new spending, a huge increase in government power, or some combination thereof.

After the debate, I took a little tour around the National Review blogs and was absolutely amazed to find them saying that Hillary won the debate. In my opinion, she delivered the single worst performance of any top tier candidate, on either side, so far this year.

What happened time and time again throughout the debate was that Tim Russert would ask Hillary a question, she would parse her answer to lead you in a certain direction, but leave herself enough wiggle room to do a 180 on the subject if the polls change, and then Russert would call her on it.

After watching her performance, you couldn't help but think back to Bill Clinton saying, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is," during his grand jury testimony and think, "that's exactly what she'd be like." Maybe political junkies are impressed with her deceptive wording, but it's hard to imagine any ordinary person, conservative, liberal, or moderate, watching Hillary's performance last night and thinking, "That's what I want in a President."

So, huge, huge, loser: Hillary. The winner? I'm going to say Obama with Edwards and Richardson close behind, but I'm not sure that anyone came out of that debate looking better than they did going in.

PS #2: Here's Hillary's "all over the place" answer on driver's licenses for illegal aliens,

John Hawkins | 09:35 AM | ( (0)

Back to top
_________________
"Calling an illegal alien, an "undocumented immigrant", is like calling a drug dealer, an "unlicensed pharmacist "

homerskid · Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:47 pm Post subject:

I found this statement ,contained in the article. very interesting:

"Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual,” Penn said, before adding that it “is, in fact, an extremely confusing situation … I think there will be further clarification.”

Hmmm....a typo,or is the Hillary camp already refering to her as PRESIDENT CLINTON?

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/01/hillary-whines-keeps-digging-on-illegal-immigration/

Hillary whines, keeps digging on illegal immigration Update: CNS gets pols on the record
posted at 10:35 am on November 1, 2007 by Bryan
Send to a Friend | printer-friendly

As I reported earlier today, Hillary Clinton has come down on the radical side of granting drivers licenses to illegal aliens. That’s going to resonate in a bad way with the voters, both in the primaries and the general if she gets that far.

Voters want control of the borders and workplace and recreating an immigration system that works and oppose driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants – positions supported by about two-thirds of the country. For them, that is the starting point, the common sense of the issue. If political leaders do not start there, they are not likely to be heard on other steps.
That’s from the latest Democracy Corps (James Carville et al) look at the electorate. And it’s quoted in this very cogent post on theGarance, a liberal blog.

Perhaps I am not giving my fellow Americans enough credit, however, it seems to me that the Democratic presidential field last night just committed suicide en masse, with Hillary Clinton the last to swallow the poison by holding out until this afternoon to endorse New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s proposal to give illegal immigrants some form of driver’s licenses.

First, let us recall that the reason comprehensive immigration reform failed this past year was not because the president blocked it, but because the people rose up and opposed it. Recall also that Spitzer’s initial plan on driver’s licenses failed, for similar reasons. John McCain’s candidacy crumbled in the face of his support for immigration reform.
Read the whole thing. I’m probably giving it a kiss of death by endorsing it from this political point of view, but it’s right on the money.

Now, that said, how is Hillary responding to the immigration ripples that she started on debate night when she flip-flopped around whether or not to give illegal aliens legal drivers licences? Not well.
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) top advisers, doing damage control after the candidate’s debate performance Tuesday, told supporters on a conference call Wednesday that the campaign needed more money to fight back.

More money? The Clinton campaign has raised more money than any previous campaign in history. They don’t need more money. They need a coherent position, and a candidate who believes in it and can convince the voters that she believes in it.

[Clinton advisor Mark Penn], Mantz and several supporters hinted repeatedly on the call that Clinton was unfairly targeted by Tim Russert, debate moderator and host of NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“Russert made it appear that President Clinton had done something new or unusual,” Penn said, before adding that it “is, in fact, an extremely confusing situation … I think there will be further clarification.”
—
While one supporter voiced his concern that the Clinton campaign is not devoting enough money and staff to Iowa, lagging behind Obama, most supporters who commented on the call expressed their displeasure with what they saw as the moderators’ focus on Clinton.
One caller from Oklahoma City said that “the questions … were designed to incite a brawl,” and that Russert’s and Brian Williams’s moderating was “an abdication of journalistic responsibility.”

Another said Russert “should be shot,” before quickly adding that she shouldn’t say that on a conference call.
Penn and Mantz said they were hearing a lot of the same sentiment from other supporters, but they do not plan to engage the media or the debate’s moderators.

Call the waaaambulance, folks. Your candidate is the front-runner. She’s going to be the focus of the debates and she’s going to be asked tough questions. If Hillary can’t face down Tim Russert over a question about the drivers licenses for illegal aliens, how on earth can she face down the mad mullahs over questions about whether or not they’re gunning to nuke Israel?

She’d better learn, and fast. Two-thirds of the voters don’t support her radical position on illegal immigration. Those voters get it; elite Democrats like Hillary and Harry Reid (and too many elite Republicans too) don’t get it. They all just see cheap labor and potential voters. They don’t see or choose not to see the costs in real dollars and national security and national integrity that having essentially no border creates. But 66% of the country sees it, and they’ll vote accordingly.

Update: CNS News went to the Hill to get a few Republicans and Democrats on the record re licenses for illegals.
_________________
"Calling an illegal alien, an "undocumented immigrant", is like calling a drug dealer, an "unlicensed pharmacist "

homerskid · Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:16 pm Post subject:

I watched some of that debate,and I may be wrong,but I don't remember Russert saying the letter to the ArcHives was recent,only a week or so old.

I think Clinton who is very good at lying through his teeth ,slyly slipped that in under the radar.

Looks like we have come full circle here. Now Hillary lies,and Bubba the Slug swears to it.

I always viewed Russert as being pretty liberal,so is Bubba claiming there is now a LEFT WING CONSPIRACY???

Check out this video...it reminds me of the great lie to the nation.."I never had sex with that woman" and things like "define ,being alone" and "it depends on what the meaning of IS,is".

His face gets red,he jabs his finger at those present and the camera,and has that disgusting half smile,half snear ,I am smarter than you look on his mug!

No...we do not want this lying tag team back in the White House.

homer

VIDEO:

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/thebigblog/archives/124945.asp
_________________
"Calling an illegal alien, an "undocumented immigrant", is like calling a drug dealer, an "unlicensed pharmacist "

homerskid · Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:31 pm Post subject:

Hillary:

Where she stands on the issues...lol

11/05 Hillary Clinton - The Politics of Parsing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIiCLPCnb0U

Note:

If Bubba forces them to remove it from youtube,I believe Edwards has it on his website.
_________________
"Calling an illegal alien, an "undocumented immigrant", is like calling a drug dealer, an "unlicensed pharmacist "